X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-Authenticated: #527675 Message-ID: <48310648.90406@gmx.de> Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 06:47:04 +0200 From: Reinhard Nissl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080226 SUSE/2.0.0.12-1.1 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: fork performance Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Hi, running the following command sequence in bash yields little numbers compared to a real unix system: while true ; do date ; done | uniq -c 15 Thu May 15 10:40:22 2008 16 Thu May 15 10:40:23 2008 17 Thu May 15 10:40:24 2008 17 Thu May 15 10:40:25 2008 17 Thu May 15 10:40:26 2008 16 Thu May 15 10:40:27 2008 17 Thu May 15 10:40:28 2008 16 Thu May 15 10:40:29 2008 Is there a chance to speedup performance? Bye. -- Dipl.-Inform. (FH) Reinhard Nissl mailto:rnissl AT gmx DOT de -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/