X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: "Dave Korn" To: References: <045401c8afa0$2e51f390$2708a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <045701c8afa2$9c9ff2f0$2708a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> Subject: RE: '%=' invalid? (inline assembly) Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 19:10:01 +0100 Message-ID: <045b01c8afa4$66e28e00$2708a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <045701c8afa2$9c9ff2f0$2708a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Dave Korn wrote on 06 May 2008 18:57: Replying to myself for the last time in this thread, I promise! > A second option might be to try and make use of the "\@" feature of > macros, although I'm not sure how easy that would be; you might have to > do some trickery to avoid emitting the macro definition repeatedly every > time the asm got inlined. ... or you might not, depending how GAS feels about repeatedly redefining a macro; I don't actually know if it's allowed or not, and haven't tested it. cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/