X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:44:47 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: coreutils-6.10-1 Message-ID: <20080415084447.GA18425@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20080411171048 DOT GV23852 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Apr 14 21:17, Eric Blake wrote: > Eric Blake byu.net> writes: > > > The cost of stat'ing a known symlink (which may involve spinning up a disk or > > doing a network access) just to color its target was deemed too expensive for > > the default. Coreutils 6.11 is due out this week, with no change in > behavior, > > but perhaps for 6.12, upstream can add a option to dircolors/ls that requests > > coloring symlink targets in spite of the increased cost of the stat. > > > > Also, you can use ls -F to force the stat, and hence the coloring. Using -F is ok for the time being. While the extra stat call is a big performance hit, it's also helpful to identify dangling symlinks. Not that all uncolored symlinks are dangling but the coloring confines the selection... Thanks for your confirmation, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/