X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <47F9A114.3060608@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2008 23:20:36 -0500 From: "Yaakov (Cygwin Ports)" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Attn: cygport maintainer [was: Re: Libtool 2.2.2] References: <47F6A816 DOT 2010208 AT alice DOT it> <47F73BA6 DOT 6000001 AT alice DOT it> <47F7E1D1 DOT 804DF919 AT dessent DOT net> <47F94F88 DOT 6050705 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> In-Reply-To: <47F94F88.6050705@cwilson.fastmail.fm> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Chuck, I have yet to try libtool 2.2, but I'm sure that you have thoroughly tested it. Could you clarify a few things: *) Most packages still use a 1.5 libtool, if not older. Is LT_OUTPUT the default if the old-style AC_PROG_LIBTOOL macro is called? If it's not, it should be, as I know of a number of packages which rely on the libtool script during configure. *) Is running autoupdate recommended or beneficial when building a package using 1.5? *) If 2.2 is backwards compatible with 1.5, but they can't be installed in parallel, why not just rename all versions of the package to "libtool"? Yaakov -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFH+aEUpiWmPGlmQSMRCNzZAKCwVUZSnCfNT40qbcKMmSZk+YG8yQCgkBH6 MaRdX7OWU/E8oxNtBwYJMhs= =Jk2A -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/