X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 11:20:36 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, GCC Patches , Andreas Schwab Subject: Re: [PATCH] Build system cleanups 1/4 Message-ID: <20080327152036.GD20834@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, GCC Patches , Andreas Schwab References: <47EB7269 DOT 3090309 AT gnu DOT org> <47EB7928 DOT 5050407 AT gnu DOT org> <47EB8026 DOT 7070506 AT gnu DOT org> <20080327151832 DOT GC20834 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080327151832.GC20834@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:18:32AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:08:22PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> Andreas Schwab wrote: >>> Paolo Bonzini writes: >>>> If so, were you aware that the target libiberty is not compiled as >>>> PIC? >>> This is not true. >> >> Here is the patch I'll test. I'll commit this as build system maintainer; >> of course any other patch to convert libiberty to libtool will have to be >> approved by the libiberty maintainers. >> >> Paolo > >>2008-03-27 Paolo Bonzini >> >> * configure.ac (frags): Don't set, use frag instead. >> (PICFLAG): Set here and substitute. >> * Makefile.in: Substitute from autoconf. >> * configure: Regenerate. > >FWIW, Cygwin's reliance on libiberty, so: Duh. Try again. Cygwin no longer relies on libiberty, so... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/