X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <47DFB694.6020606@cwilson.fastmail.fm> Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 07:33:24 -0500 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: csih-0.1-1 References: <42afa7b00803180422s59037a2dq5aafb39243f8cd15 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> In-Reply-To: <42afa7b00803180422s59037a2dq5aafb39243f8cd15@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Kostya Altukhov wrote: > I get the following when I test my script with auto-answer="yes": > > *** Info: The following privileged accounts were found: 'cyg_server' . > *** Info: This script plans to use 'cyg_server'. > *** Info: 'cyg_server' will not be able to log on interactively, but will only > *** Info: be used by registered services. > *** Query: Do you want to use different name? (yes/no) yes > > Wouldn't it make more sense to ask the opposite question, e.g. "Is it > OK to use the suggested name? (yes/no)", in that case auto-answer > "yes" would accept the default? No, because the most common "auto-answer" case is when csih-client scripts are invoked by setup, via a postinstall script. In these cases, the auto-answer setting is "no". Frankly, I do not believe there should be an "auto-answer=yes" option at all. It's just too dangerous. However, csih retained it because the original foo-config scripts supported "auto-answer-yes", but I do not recommed its use. -- Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/