X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <47D71C25.C2241DBE@dessent.net> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:56:21 -0700 From: Brian Dessent X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Incident: gdb.exe seems to fail when launched from win (and no cygprogs in stack). References: <47D4A7E4 DOT 5070509 AT tlinx DOT org> <47D4B7D2 DOT 1F78DADB AT dessent DOT net> <47D4E892 DOT 1090305 AT tlinx DOT org> <47D50BB6 DOT EFB28302 AT dessent DOT net> <47D6056B DOT 6000805 AT tlinx DOT org> <47D610C2 DOT EECE7EE9 AT dessent DOT net> <47D71630 DOT 8050508 AT tlinx DOT org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Linda Walsh wrote: > The same binary that didn't work yesterday *is* *working* today. I > haven't rebooted (but my system did hibernate, so maybe that re-arranged > memory?), nor run any updates. Perhaps it was a memory fragmentation > issue, though not sure why it was so specific to directory what it > was called from. I'm glad to hear that it has resolved itself, but I certainly sympathize with the uneasy feeling of wondering what changed and why. Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/