X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <47D484BB.300A68B5@dessent.net> Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 17:45:47 -0700 From: Brian Dessent X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Does cygwin still work on 9x? References: <31DDB7BE4BF41D4888D41709C476B6570929AC27 AT NIHCESMLBX5 DOT nih DOT gov> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com "Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E]" wrote: > I noted the following in <[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: cygwin-1.5.25-11> > - Allow cygcheck to run on Windows 9x again. > Does this mean that cygwin still works on win9x? Cygwin 1.7.x will not support 9x/ME. This is what is currently in CVS HEAD, and the code there already for some time has a number of features and changes that won't work with 9x/ME as there is lots of major development going on. Cygwin 1.5.x is intended to always remain compatible, and that is why it is maintained on a separate branch. In the case of cygcheck, a patch from HEAD was accidently backported to the 1.5 branch from HEAD without anyone realizing that it caused caused 1.5 cygcheck to not function on 9x/ME. When we realized this we fixed the incompatibility so that cygcheck (both on the branch and HEAD) is again able to run again on non-NT systems. Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/