X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Marc Girod Subject: Attachment without nntp (was: Uuencoded cygcheck) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:05:38 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 21 Message-ID: References: <005c01c87584$518c6f30$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <012c01c876f1$94f095d0$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <003601c8779b$4af55f10$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <47C2D268 DOT 2080300 AT cygwin DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Marc Girod gmail.com> writes: > > Larry Hall (Cygwin cygwin.com> writes: > > > > > Is this really a recommended way of transmitting this information? > I note in addition: ... > - that nobody replied anymore... Well, I tried now the alternative road, and installed TunderBird. I guess I got what I expected: neither nntp nor snntp (563) ports are drilled in my company's firewall. So, this road is blocked too, no? What next? Cry, yes, but then? Marc -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/