X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:22:05 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: chown with not existing user/group Message-ID: <20080229092205.GQ9539@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <008b01c87a16$308a0540$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Feb 29 09:16, Matthieu CASTET wrote: > Hi, > > Dave Korn artimi.com> writes: > > > > > Because it has to emulate unix perms by relating uid/gid to windows RIDs, > which are owned, allocated and > > controlled by the system, and not under the arbitrary choice of the user, so > the semantics wouldn't be the > > same even if we did create ACLs with unrecognised SIDs on them. > > > Another question, why isn't possible to mount the partition with a special flag > (like managed mode), where the permision are stored in a database instead of > trying to map them on windows perms. Why do you want to fake security when yoi can get the real thing? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/