X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Matthieu CASTET Subject: Re: chown with not existing user/group Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:16:53 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 19 Message-ID: References: <008b01c87a16$308a0540$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Hi, Dave Korn artimi.com> writes: > > Because it has to emulate unix perms by relating uid/gid to windows RIDs, which are owned, allocated and > controlled by the system, and not under the arbitrary choice of the user, so the semantics wouldn't be the > same even if we did create ACLs with unrecognised SIDs on them. > Another question, why isn't possible to mount the partition with a special flag (like managed mode), where the permision are stored in a database instead of trying to map them on windows perms. This mode will do something like what does fakeroot on Linux. Matthieu -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/