X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <6910a60802270735x3441fd76id868f1ebe7a4d89@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:35:54 +0100 From: "Reini Urban" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Testing gcc 4.2.3 In-Reply-To: <47C45534.A74427F4@dessent.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <47C45106 DOT 6090300 AT pobox DOT com> <47C45534 DOT A74427F4 AT dessent DOT net> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 6b8cc41e337e170e X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com 2008/2/26, Brian Dessent: > Sigh. You'll have to search the archives. There are a number of things > preventing a move to gcc 4.x as the system compiler. The main snags are > lack of shared libgcc (which breaks C++ EH with shared libraries) and > the everlasting debate about if and how to transition to DW2 EH from > SJLJ. About the shared libgcc: Since this problem will not go away until we decide to keep the old and slow WINAPI compatible SJLJ (hopefully not), we can just add this libgcc as Base package. Similar to the msvcrt.dll in the windows world. Our problem is much less dramatic than for the MSYS folks, who really don't want to another external dependency. -- Reini -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/