X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <47C0DDDD.7090809@tlinx.org> Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 19:00:45 -0800 From: Linda Walsh User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: running cygcheck...empty packages? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Greetings Cygwinians, Was notice what appeared to be 'old' versions of some files laying around, so wanted to verify packages -- "cygcheck -c" It pops up some packages that are empty. I was wondering both why I downloaded them (?!) and whether or not I needed them. Some look "important", others...not so sure... Not a long list, some I know "should" be able to delete without causing myself undue pain, but 'gcc' and 'gcc-mingw' sorta bother me. If I delete those would my gcc installations still be happy? Package 'clear' makes sense that it is clear of any files...*cough*...not really sure why it's there. I'm not entirely sure where cygcheck is getting its package list, since I don't see any files in /etc/setup with names like "gcc.lst.gz". Are these "empty" packages of use? atk-runtime clear gcc gcc-mingw libxml2-python pkgconfig pylibxml2 tetex -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/