X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <47B981E2.B6FEC53F@dessent.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 05:02:26 -0800
From: Brian Dessent <brian AT dessent DOT net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: is it possible to re-compile sshd to support "real-user" login in   terms of public key authentication
References: <47b97e22 DOT 1ed7720a DOT 6129 DOT 734a AT mx DOT google DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Chen Yue wrote:

> requires password in the third parameter. So I wonder how Tectia sshd
> implements this mechanism.

You'd have to ask them.  They probably install a LSA module.  Cygwin has
this capability as well in the unreleased CVS version.

> Is it possible I re-compile Cygwin sshd to support this feature?

I don't understand the logic here.  If certain functionality is not
implemented how is simply recompiling going to change anything?

Brian

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/