X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-Mailer: 21.4 (patch 21) "Educational Television" XEmacs Lucid (via feedmail 10 I) To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: gettext 0.16.1 References: <643594189 DOT 20080214191901 AT gswot DOT org> <47B48D8D DOT 6090404 AT cygwin DOT com> <47B52D87 DOT 8010209 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> From: "Dr. Volker Zell" Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:55:48 +0100 In-Reply-To: <47B52D87.8010209@cwilson.fastmail.fm> (Charles Wilson's message of "Fri, 15 Feb 2008 01:13:27 -0500") Message-ID: <7ztzka8up7.fsf@vzell-de.de.oracle.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) XEmacs/21.4.21 (cygwin32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com >>>>> Charles Wilson writes: > But right now, the gettext maintainer is pretty d*** pissed off that > he ever adopted the cygport tool in the first place. The gettext > maintainer, in fits of momentary insanity, sometimes considers > /officially/ forking cygport -- as opposed to the unofficial fork > sitting on his hard drive for the last year+. Because that'd be a lot > easier -- and a lot less demeaning -- than begging for crumbs for > months and months and months. But then he realizes he's doing a > poor-to-awful job of maintaining the packages he has NOW, and has no > business taking on any more. I was always under the impression that our src packages should be selfcontained in the cygwin.com world. So it should be possible by downloading the build requirements from the cygwin mirrors to get a working binary package. This doesn't seem to be true anymore with the increasing local patches to cygport. The official cygwin cygport is still at 0.2.10. What we need is an official statement from Yaakov if he is ever willing to incorporate Chuck's patches, otherwise I would also go with Chucks suggestion of forking cygport. From my point of view his patches are the missing bit of functionality to make cygport a swiss army knife for porting. Ciao Volker -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/