X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <47AD1903.90E6284B@dessent.net> Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2008 19:07:47 -0800 From: Brian Dessent X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Uninstalling Cygwin References: <20080208152939 DOT GD31070 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <47AC9E75 DOT 3050709 AT free DOT fr> <20080208184038 DOT GA2996 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <47AD00AA DOT 3050501 AT etr-usa DOT com> <47AD0525 DOT 101427C AT dessent DOT net> <47AD138E DOT 3070407 AT etr-usa DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Warren Young wrote: > We have a behavioral psychology problem here, not a technology problem: > if the item of interest isn't on the first page of results, many will > stop looking right there and post to the mailing list. They've done > their bit, and looked in the FAQ, right? And what I'm (apparently, poorly) trying to say is that we should only have links to the no-chunks version so that it's impossible to get confused as there's only one choice. We can leave the chunked pages on the server so that old links continue to work, but I really don't see why they are useful, specifically for the reason the poster expressed. Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/