X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: "Dave Korn" To: References: <20080204150853 DOT GD5866 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20080204205620 DOT GA2720 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <02fb01c86795$9aeb5080$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <20080205133450 DOT GB307 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <032c01c867fd$c573da30$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <20080205142712 DOT GA840 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <03a301c86835$1a571850$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> Subject: RE: CIFS symlinks on network share break Cygwin Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 14:46:19 -0000 Message-ID: <04ad01c86998$34e53080$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 07 February 2008 00:22, Matt Seitz wrote: > "Dave Korn" wrote in message > news:03a301c86835$1a571850$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM... I did?! It was email when *I* last saw it! >> My win32 "T:" drive is a netapp share (CIFS with NFS perms) > I'm assuming you mean "T: maps to a CIFS share that points to a volume or > QTree that is configured with the UNIX security model". Yep, pardon loose terminology. > If that is the > case, NetApp will not allow you to change file permissions. Configuring a > volume or QTree to use the UNIX security model means that only NFS clients > are allowed to change security permissions. If you want to be able to > change permissions, you need to set the security model to either "Mixed" > (both CIFS and NFS can change permissions) or "NTFS" (CIFS can change > permissions, NFS can't). Don't think people would like me playing around with structural configuration on the main live production server... ;-) I'm not up-to-date on the state of cygwin vs. nfs, but that would probably be another solution for me. > Actually, as another poster mentioned, there is another option. NetApp > provides a special Windows Explorer shell extension called "SecureShare". > This extension allows CIFS clients to change permissions on UNIX security > model volumes and QTrees. If cygwin could hook into that mechanism, it > could change permissions on UNIX security model volumes and QTrees. Heh, yes, I know. I was that other poster! cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/