X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <47A8C603.50908@x-ray.at> Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 21:24:35 +0100 From: Reini Urban User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de-AT; rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20071128 SeaMonkey/1.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Cygwin emulates an environment closest to ... References: <15296985 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> In-Reply-To: <15296985.post@talk.nabble.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com nobody schrieb: > Cygwin emulates an environment closest to SunOS, Solaris, HP-UX, IBM's AIX, > DEC OSF (Digital UNIX), or IRIX ? > No this is not my homework. I need to know the closest archetype for a > makefile. Looking at the makefiles in question would certainly help more than just some OS names. Url of your app? gnu tools? autotools? All are more or less unix like, but unix's not unix. Esp. such high-powered unices, which could come without gnu at all. Not just a simple gnu linux or bsd, which are closest to cygwin. At least it's no VMS, MVS/OS-390 or lispmachine, so call yourself lucky. -- Reini -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/