X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4a89b8680801180616s3adb9071ndc8ab96e354a381c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 08:16:57 -0600 From: paul DOT hermeneutic AT gmail DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: ps executable does not appear to match source MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > On Jan 17, 2008 9:38 PM, <> wrote: > > The ps that comes with Cygwin is missing a number of features that > > appear to be in the procps-3.2.7/ps/ source code. The source code > > does not look like it was used to build the executable. Is this > > correct? > > Cygwin has both ps and procps available. The ps in Cygwin has the > advantage of showing Windows processes, too. The procps is just what > you'd expect. > > -Jason The ps from procps appears to be what is in use on Linux. Why is the ps for Cygwin not built from this? From which package is the ps in Cygwin built? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/