X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:14:58 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: "net use" (and "net config") Message-ID: <20080117201458.GW5097@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <478E9184 DOT 2060909 AT free DOT fr> <478EE840 DOT 2090603 AT cygwin DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Jan 17 19:50, Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2008-01-17, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: > > >>> It means that you can have the same (network) drive letter > >>> assigned multiple times, one in each userland. > >> > >> And when logged in using public key authentication, you don't > >> have a "userland"? > > > > Well you do but it's SYSTEM's "userland". You can by authenticating explicitely for every single share. When you log in with pubkey authentication, you can attach to the share like this: bash$ net use \\\\server\\share /user:domain\\username password The drawback is that the share isn't persistent. You have to do the above every time you log in using pubkey. > So why can't one map drives in SYSTEM's "userland"? > > > I suppose you could try opening a system-owned shell and "net > > use"ing the share you want. Google for the recipe to create a > > system-owned shell. > > Why the difference in userland depending on which > authentication method is used? You don't have the full set of user credentials as you would have if you used password authentication. The user token is missing the credentials to connect to remote shares automatically. That's not really a surprise, but it's a surprise that there's no really easy, intuitive workaround. > That seems really counter-intuitive. It is. But it's nothing we can do about, really. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/