X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 10:22:55 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygwin 1.5.25-7: cygcheck does not work? Message-ID: <20071221152254.GA1769@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <801053 DOT 56837 DOT qm AT web33210 DOT mail DOT mud DOT yahoo DOT com> <04df01c843df$265ff510$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <04df01c843df$265ff510$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 02:38:28PM -0000, Dave Korn wrote: >On 21 December 2007 12:41, Alexey Lyubimov wrote: > >> Thanks, Brian! >> But what would be the "final" decision? As far as I >> understand 1.5.x branch MUST support Win98. Am I >> right? >> Should I wait for 1.5.25-8 (where hard dependencies on >> NT-dll would be removed, I hope) or should I downgrade >> to some previous 1.5.25-x? > > Possibly the best solution for now would be: > >1. downgrade to working 1.5.25-x >2. cp /bin/cygcheck.exe /tmp >3. upgrade back to 1.5.25-7 >4. cp /tmp/cygcheck.exe /bin > >i.e. just save the good version of cygcheck from the old version of the install. Or, just download a snapshot and extract cygcheck.exe from it. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/