X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
From: "Dave Korn" <dave DOT korn AT artimi DOT com>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <801053 DOT 56837 DOT qm AT web33210 DOT mail DOT mud DOT yahoo DOT com>
Subject: RE: cygwin 1.5.25-7: cygcheck does not work?
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 14:38:28 -0000
Message-ID: <04df01c843df$265ff510$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; 	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To: <801053.56837.qm@web33210.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 21 December 2007 12:41, Alexey Lyubimov wrote:

> Thanks, Brian!
> But what would be the "final" decision? As far as I
> understand 1.5.x branch MUST support Win98. Am I
> right?
> Should I wait for 1.5.25-8 (where hard dependencies on
> NT-dll would be removed, I hope) or should I downgrade
> to some previous 1.5.25-x?

  Possibly the best solution for now would be:

1.  downgrade to working 1.5.25-x
2.  cp /bin/cygcheck.exe /tmp
3.  upgrade back to 1.5.25-7
4.  cp /tmp/cygcheck.exe /bin

i.e. just save the good version of cygcheck from the old version of the install.

    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/