X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <47674E3E.2080201@cygwin.com> Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 23:36:14 -0500 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070505 Remi/2.0.0.0-3.fc4.remi Thunderbird/2.0.0.0 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Intermittent perl crash References: <6910a60712171332t3e8db66fn4cf1a64fe611011 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Michael Kairys wrote: > > "Reini Urban" wrote in message > news:6910a60712171332t3e8db66fn4cf1a64fe611011 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com... > >> Known problem and easy to fix. >> Download the rebase package, read the readme, stop all cygwin services >> and >> run rebaseall in ash. > > Thank you for the timely reply! However I am stuck on what should be a > simple step: rebaseall tells me /tmp is not writable. I have tried a > variety of directories (all of which are actually writable of course) > and a variety of ways of geting there, including mount point, env. var, > etc. > > Further experimentation leads me to believe the shell will return false > for -w of any directory. This is consistent with the apparent mode of > 555 I see on all of them. And of course they don't respond to chmod. (I > believe this is a windows thing that I have even read about somewhere in > the cygwin docs...) > > So I am left with the question: how would this ever work? -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/