X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <476092A7.9010209@cornell.edu> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 21:02:15 -0500 From: Ken Brown User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Not yet supported [Attn emacs maintainer] References: <041701c83682$340bb510$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <14297841 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <14298291 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <14300048 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <14301296 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <003001c83cf0$26a58b20$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <14302172 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <47603A05 DOT 8020607 AT cornell DOT edu> <476089AC DOT 10207 AT byu DOT net> In-Reply-To: <476089AC.10207@byu.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 12/12/2007 8:23 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > So, is emacs 22.1 ever going to be promoted to current? Unfortunately, there are serious problems with the (experimental) emacs 22.1 package, as I and at least one other person reported last July when it was released. See especially http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2007-07/msg00773.html http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2007-07/msg00799.html http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2007-07/msg00844.html I haven't heard whether there's been any progress resolving this. Ken -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/