X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <47600FC7.8010101@awcubed.com> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:43:51 -0500 From: Archie Warnock User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Stop turning CPAN modules into Cygwin packages References: <1ff86f510712120704w5f175db9md89d05d936d535ed AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Igor Peshansky wrote: > BTW, this problem must have been encountered (and, hopefully, solved) by > other distros. How does the Debian git package handle this? I seem to > recall that at least Red Hat Linux at some point had packages for some > CPAN modules... I don't know how they solve dependencies, or if it has anything to do with dependencies, but I can tell you that Fedora Core 8 (and earlier versions) have a _lot_ of CPAN modules packaged as RPMs. I, too, prefer to get my modules directly from CPAN but I do run into occasional compilation problems from time to time. At those times, it's really handy to have the packages available. But, as already mentioned, those should be fixes that are passed upstream to the CPAN module owner/maintainer anyway. -- Archie -- Archie Warnock Internet: warnock AT awcubed DOT com -- A/WWW Enterprises http://www.awcubed.com -- As a matter of fact, I _do_ speak for my employer. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/