X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 12:44:38 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: 1.5.24-2: unalbe to get a core Dump file Message-ID: <20071206114438.GN26345@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <47568201 DOT 80303 AT garr DOT it> <4756E558 DOT 1A70439F AT dessent DOT net> <47573096 DOT 7050007 AT portugalmail DOT pt> <20071206110146 DOT GL26345 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071206110146.GL26345@calimero.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Dec 6 12:01, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Dec 5 23:13, Pedro Alves wrote: > > Brian Dessent wrote: > > > >> As already mentioned downthread, if you want a core dump you should > >> simply set error_start=c:/cygwin/bin/dumper.exe, modulo dumper bugs > >> (which should have all been fixed in the latest version.) > > > > The cvs version still doesn't work for me if I link > > it with the distributed bfd -- it crashes in that case. > > The latest fixes were done with a bfd from cvs. > > > > I haven't tried the latest test version, but > > should have the same problem. > > Do you imply that we need a new binutils package to get dumper working? I just built dumper with a bfd from CVS HEAD(*). It seems to work on the first glance. Setting error_start as above, it catches the division by zero from the OP's test app and creates a core file. However, this core file doesn't seem to be very helpful, at least when using GDB from the distro: (gdb) i thr 3 process 1984 0x7c95077b in ntdll!KiIntSystemCall () from /mnt/c/WINDOWS/system32/ntdll.dll 2 process 3020 0x7c90eb94 in ntdll!LdrAccessResource () from /mnt/c/WINDOWS/system32/ntdll.dll * 1 process 3836 0x7c90eb94 in ntdll!LdrAccessResource () from /mnt/c/WINDOWS/system32/ntdll.dll None of the backtraces shows anything beyond the system DLLs. Do we also need a newer GDB for this to be useful? Corinna (*) Btw., the new testrelease 1.5.24-4 contains this dumper.exe linked against bfd from CVS HEAD. -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/