X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <474A1B4B.1090704@cygwin.com> Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 20:03:07 -0500 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070505 Remi/2.0.0.0-3.fc4.remi Thunderbird/2.0.0.0 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: utf-8 and cygwin References: <200711251046 DOT lAPAkZbO015926 AT cba1 DOT math DOT Berkeley DOT EDU> In-Reply-To: <200711251046.lAPAkZbO015926@cba1.math.Berkeley.EDU> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mariusz Wodzicki wrote: > I would like to reopen the discussion about utf-8 support in cygwin. > > SIXTEEN months passed since there were some exchanges about it > on the cygwin mail list. > > The lack of support for filenames with non-Latin1 characters is > currently the MOST SEVERE LIMITATION of cygwin in my opinion. > > Due to the international nature of internet more and more of us > are getting all sorts of files with utf-8 filenames. > > In presence of such files in our file systems, all the basic > commands are broken (ls, cp, mv, diff, rsync, et cetera). > > This becomes more and more annoying with every passing day. > > What is the current situation? When can we expect that > this problem gets resolved? Work is going on in CVS (the eventual 1.7.x series) to handle long file names/paths. This will enable Unicode internally at least. Check out CVS and lend a hand if you're able. -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/