X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 12:56:33 -0500 (EST) From: Igor Peshansky Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: Thomas Baker cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Reliable old script loses data on new Cygwin installation In-Reply-To: <20071113165901.GA2096@sub-tombaker> Message-ID: References: <20071111173033 DOT GA2360 AT sub-tombaker> <20071112090628 DOT GA3792 AT sub-tombaker> <20071113165901 DOT GA2096 AT sub-tombaker> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, Thomas Baker wrote: > The /bin/pdksh script sequence that is causing problems is: > [snip] The obvious question is: do you still get the error if you replace pdksh with bash, or is the problem pdksh-specific? When you reduce this to a minimal testcase, are there bits of that testcase that require pdksh to be used? Igor -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu | igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ Igor Peshansky, Ph.D. (name changed!) |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' old name: Igor Pechtchanski '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow! Belief can be manipulated. Only knowledge is dangerous. -- Frank Herbert -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/