X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4734FAC8.6080905@cygwin.com> Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 19:26:48 -0500 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070505 Remi/2.0.0.0-3.fc4.remi Thunderbird/2.0.0.0 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Permissions/acl problem References: <47349DE5 DOT 6020500 AT cygwin DOT com> <4734EDA4 DOT FAE2802E AT dessent DOT net> <4734F100 DOT 30108 AT cygwin DOT com> <4734F35C DOT 18E4808D AT dessent DOT net> In-Reply-To: <4734F35C.18E4808D@dessent.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Brian Dessent wrote: > "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" wrote: > >> the info already provided. But given that the OP was able to list the >> contents of the share from cron, he's managed this in some way. Assuming >> this information is not faulty, 'smbntsec' may indeed be what he needs to >> manipulate permissions on these files. But I would certainly encourage the >> OP to review the current state of his configuration given the information >> above and make sure that he's clear on what's required to accomplish the >> desired end. > > If it was a smbntsec problem, he would have had problems in both a > normal user shell and from within the cronjob. But it worked fine from > his normal account (without smbntsec set) and was read-only from within > the cronjob, which to me implied that it was being accessed in the > context of the guest account, i.e. it was still readable as guest but > required authentication to write. And the fact that he can access it at all through cron suggests that something else is going on. I'd say we're both in agreement that if the feedback given so far isn't enough for the OP to solve his problem, more information about the current configuration is required if we're going to have a chance of helping out. -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/