X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <472B18DD.54DD80DD@dessent.net> Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 05:32:29 -0700 From: Brian Dessent X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: copying a million tiny files? References: <47299D6F DOT 9050909 AT pacific DOT net DOT sg> <495440 DOT 40075 DOT qm AT web25007 DOT mail DOT ukl DOT yahoo DOT com> <31b7d2790711012031vd8e072ex8a4312b8e8b84ad5 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Richard Copley wrote: > Well, you'd think. Just because they made an improved version of the command in Vista doesn't mean that the old xcopy ceases to work or to be just as portable as it's always been. Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/