X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <472B00E0.C73A8EE@dessent.net> Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 03:50:08 -0700 From: Brian Dessent X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Cygwin1.dll References: <4578565 DOT 268561193999540871 DOT JavaMail DOT nabble AT isper DOT nabble DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Reply to the mailing list, not to me. sroberts82 AT yahoo DOT com wrote: > Hi Brian thank you very much for your answer. > Why then, when I build with borland say, there is no such dependancy and I can just give that exe to anyone and it just works? It still has a dependency on a C runtime library, it's just that that library MSVCRT.DLL happens to be already installed in your Windows directory so you can pretend that it's not there if you squint hard enough. You can achieve the same thing with gcc by using MinGW. But as I already said, this means using only the functions and APIs that Windows provides, which means no POSIX emulation. Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/