X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <21e1598b0710081437m3f43ae06k9b2f58ec41819be6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 23:37:16 +0200 From: "Damjan Lango" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: file locking behaviour In-Reply-To: <21e1598b0710081432g3cedf377wbb69d023cf08bb22@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <21e1598b0710081432g3cedf377wbb69d023cf08bb22 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Hello! I have a program that uses: lock.l_type = F_WRLCK; fcntl(log->handle, F_SETLK, &lock) the file is then locked also for reads, is that correct behaviour? I thought that only writing would be locked. on unix the file stays readable even if using the above code. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/