X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
From: "Dave Korn" <dave DOT korn AT artimi DOT com>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <3759e04c0710040621p7ea473a2rc40bb994911b6704 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Subject: RE: Bad EXE format (error 193)
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 15:02:31 +0100
Message-ID: <014101c8068f$34bd2480$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; 	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To: 
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 04 October 2007 14:59, Dave Korn wrote:

> On 04 October 2007 14:56, Dave Korn wrote:
> 
>> On 04 October 2007 14:21, Lynn Winebarger wrote:
>> 
>>>    I am trying to get the Larceny Scheme compiler
>>> (http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/will/Larceny/) to compile (and work)
>>> under the most recent stable Cygwin release.  While I have managed to
>>> get it to produce a file that very closely resembles a PE file, it
>>> apparently is not close enough to satisfy Windows XP Home Edition SP 2.
>>>    Unfortunately, objdump and other file analyzers have no problem
>>> with the file, while none of the debuggers I tried had anything
>>> helpful to say about the problem.  I have compiled other things under
>>> Cygwin (PLT Scheme, for example) that not only produced an executable
>>> image but produced one Windows would actually run.  I have tried doing
>>> a diff against the headers between this and the Larceny image and
>>> cannot see a glaring error (but I am not an expert in either Windows
>>> executables or Larceny's source code).
>>>     I cannot find anything helpful on this error in the mailing list
>>> archives.  Is there a tool that would identify the problem, or maybe a
>>> kind expert with some guidance on resolving this issue?
>> 
>>   We might be able to make guesses at what was wrong with the compiled
>> program if you told us *in what way* it is "not close enough to satisfy
>> Windows XP".
> 
>   Ah.  And I just took a closer look at the subject line.  So I'm guessing
> you see an error message along those lines, yes?  Hm.  Does it still happen
> if you compile the most basic sort of "hello world" program?  


  It might also be informative to run "cygcheck <path-to-exe>" on your
compiled executable; that'll display the dependent DLLs for you.  A bit of
googling suggests that 193 can be caused by a corrupt/bogus executable, but
equally by a good executable thatt depends on a DLL which is faulty.


    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/