X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Gmane User Subject: Re: Home directory Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 20:55:08 -0400 Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: <4701AB98 DOT 10509 AT byu DOT net> <4701D003 DOT 92BBEFDE AT dessent DOT net> <4702D8CA DOT 10904 AT etr-usa DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) In-Reply-To: <4702D8CA.10904@etr-usa.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Warren Young wrote: > Gmain User wrote: >> Thanks, Brian. I was actually asking in the context of not updating cygwin >> right away. Whether or not one could access up-to-date accumulation of release >> notes, possibly on the web. > > Cygwin doesn't have monolithic "releases". Every individual package is > on its own release schedule. It's meaningless to talk about release > notes at a higher level than the package level, in the current scheme. What you say makes perfect sense. The specific package I was referring to was coreutils. Unfortunately, the quoting containing the relevant thread details had to be trimmed because of the limit on quoting when posting through gmane, which was the case in some of my posts. Don't get me wrong, gmane is great, it's just a circumstance that needs to be pointed out as a factor contributing to this confusion. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/