X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Diego Biurrun Subject: Re: llrint implementation in Cygwin Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 22:20:23 +0200 Lines: 47 Message-ID: References: <46F6C151 DOT 3070301 AT computer DOT org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i586; en-US; rv:1.8b) Gecko/20050217 In-Reply-To: X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Igor Peshansky wrote: > On Sat, 29 Sep 2007, Diego Biurrun wrote: > >>Igor Peshansky wrote: >> >>>On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Diego Biurrun wrote: >> >>>>I understand that adding llrint to Cygwin is probably not hard at >>>>all for somebody familiar with Cygwin. However, I am not such a >>>>person and I don't even have a Windows environment around to test >>>>any modifications I might make. > > Cygwin uses newlib as-is for most such functionality. So, patching > newlib to include llrint would automatically make Cygwin support it. > > Also, newlib builds on Linux just as well as it does on Windows... OK, that's useful information, thank you. In the unlikely event that I find some time to dedicate to this I might actually be motivated to have a go at this. >>>>We are about to make an MPlayer release and unfortunately it will >>>>not compile on Cygwin due to the missing llrint. I would appreciate >>>>to know if this is going to get addressed so that I can put an >>>>appropriate comment in the release notes. >>> >>>What's wrong with adding llrint to your code (perhaps with a #define, >>>i.e., >>> >>>#define llrint my_llrint >>>typeof(llrint) my_llrint(...) { ... } >>> >>>)? >> >>It is ugly and it is a workaround for a problem that should be solved >>outside of FFmpeg. Should every project using llrint add that >>workaround? No, Cygwin should be fixed. > > Fair enough. I agree that it's ugly, but ultimately it's your call -- > whether you want your project to compile on Cygwin or whether you want to > require the feature that's missing and accept that Cygwin compilation will > be broken for a while. llrint is required, so I guess Cygwin compilation will indeed be broken for a while. We don't add OS-specific workarounds to FFmpeg. Diego -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/