X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: "Dave Korn" To: References: <96c450350704071826qe3e5f5di80b7dd4375619f38 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <96c450350704071900s7c559797pcdde0542636db9b8 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <12780123 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> Subject: RE: Cygwin Installation Problems on Windows Vista (killing sh.exe helps) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 16:49:13 +0100 Message-ID: <006701c7fad4$a0835200$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <12780123.post@talk.nabble.com> Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 19 September 2007 16:42, lent wrote: > For getting the installation to keep going, killing off an sh.exe process > via > Task Manager's End Process, moves things along. This also seems to need to > be done for "texf" (I think that was the name) package. Hell, you can make the whole thing "move along" even better, by simply killing 'setup.exe' instead of sh.exe. Sure, it may not be correct, but at least it's fast, eh? Or you could wait for it to finish doing whatever vital job it was doing. Your choice. > At least we get to the final setup screen this way :-) Works my way too, *and* with the added advantage you don't end up with a semi-broken installation. cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/