X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Andrew DeFaria Subject: Re: sftp removing writable bit Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 08:19:52 -0700 Lines: 11 Message-ID: References: <000901c7f7e1$27fec9e0$020aa8c0 AT DFW5RB41> <20070917150521 DOT GB994 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) In-Reply-To: <20070917150521.GB994@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Christopher Faylor wrote: > Gary's evaluation of the situation was correct. This thread has > devolved into an uninteresting argument about whether sftp is useful > to you or not. What you don't seem to be getting is that no one > besides you finds this very interesting. > > Give it a rest please. The discussion was over several messages ago. You suffer from the delusion that even I found it interesting.... -- Andrew DeFaria Always remember to pillage BEFORE you burn. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/