Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 11:05:21 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: sftp removing writable bit
Message-ID: <20070917150521.GB994@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <fcgh3k$p6h$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <E1IWZ5Q-0001Xu-5U AT owl DOT gateway DOT 2wire DOT net> <fchepl$98k$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <000901c7f7e1$27fec9e0$020aa8c0 AT DFW5RB41> <fcl5n9$okb$2 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <fcl5n9$okb$2@sea.gmane.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 11:09:41PM -0700, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
> Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
>> [snip]
>>
>> Cygwin Content-O-Meter(tm), as of a few dozen posts in this thread ago:
>>
>> +-----------+
>> | 0% 100% |
>> | \ |
>> | \ |
>> | \ |
>> | O |
>> +-----------+
>>
>> Too bad nobody polices such things.
>
>Does your reader of choice lack functionality for skipping a particular
>thread that you find uninteresting?  Who's holding a gun to your head
>and forcing you to read?  STFU OK?

Gary's evaluation of the situation was correct.  This thread has
devolved into an uninteresting argument about whether sftp is useful to
you or not.  What you don't seem to be getting is that no one besides
you finds this very interesting.

Give it a rest please.  The discussion was over several messages ago.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/