X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <46E83E60.A794825B@dessent.net> Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 12:30:40 -0700 From: Brian Dessent X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: sftp removing writable bit References: <46E7FB17 DOT 3030904 AT scranton DOT edu> <46E8242B DOT 83D54198 AT dessent DOT net> <46E834DF DOT 151C3663 AT dessent DOT net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Thorsten Kampe wrote: > I didn't imply that - by pure magic - any FTP client is also able to > speak SFTP. By the way that's also true for FTPS, right?! You may not have meant to imply that, but you said "you can use your favorite FTP client" without any further qualification whatsoever. Someone who read that who is not familiar with the distinction between sftp and ftps would scratch their head trying to figure out why wget, ncftp, or inetutils' ftp can't seem to do anything with a sftp URL. Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/