X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Thorsten Kampe Subject: Re: sftp removing writable bit Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 20:06:11 +0100 Lines: 20 Message-ID: References: <46E7FB17 DOT 3030904 AT scranton DOT edu> <46E8242B DOT 83D54198 AT dessent DOT net> <46E834DF DOT 151C3663 AT dessent DOT net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/2.70.2067 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com * Brian Dessent (Wed, 12 Sep 2007 11:50:07 -0700) > Thorsten Kampe wrote: > > > No, that's ftps. sftp is a protocol on top of a ssh session like scp. > > > > Aah, you mean I'm only dreaming when I connect to my ssh server with > > my favourite commandline FTP clients like lftp and yafc? Time to stop > > taking all these heavy hallucinogens... > > Sigh. No, it means those particular ftp clients ALSO happen to support > sftp. It does not mean any old regular ftp client can be used, which is > what you were implying. I didn't imply that - by pure magic - any FTP client is also able to speak SFTP. By the way that's also true for FTPS, right?! Let me repeat: the advantage of using SFTP over pure ssh/scp is that a lot (not everyone) of people can use their /favourite/ ftp client (/not/ "old regular ftp client"). Thorsten -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/