X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: Tatsuro MATSUOKA To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Cc: matsuoka AT nuce DOT nagoya-u DOT ac DOT jp Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 20:32:14 +0900 Subject: gcc-dw2? or fast sjlj-exceptions EH Reply-To: matsuoka AT nuce DOT nagoya-u DOT ac DOT jp Message-Id: <20070910203214.0C81A070.matsuoka@mol.nagoya-u.ac.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: nPOP Ver 1.0.9 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com This is Tatsuro Matsuoka writing. There have been some discussions since I uploaded the topic : 'Slowness problem due to sjlj-exception for Octave'. In the topic, Brain wrote >But by the time you've done all that, you might as well >just package a separate gcc named "gcc-dw2" or whatever and have them >both installable in parallel, to please everybody. This is what Danny >did with his 4.2 MinGW releases. Is it really possible "gcc-dw2" ? I think it is grateful for me to build the fast octave if it will be used. However, I'm afraid that parallel existence of two different GCCs confuses the cygwin users. The best solution, I think, the speed of sjlj-exceptions EH on the cygwin is as fast as that of other platforms. The "gcc-dw2" is the second best solution and it should be treated with great care. I’m not a specialist on the cygwin and am mere one of the daily users of the cygwin. I would like to hear the comments and opinions from the cygwin experts. Sincerely yours, Tatsuro MATSUOKA Is there any possibility that the speed of sjlj-exceptions EH will be faster than that of present states? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/