X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: Tatsuro MATSUOKA To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Cc: matsuoka AT nuce DOT nagoya-u DOT ac DOT jp Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 08:31:29 +0900 Subject: Re: Slowness problem due to sjlj-exceptions for Octave In-Reply-To: <20070906082343.87689790.matsuoka@mol.nagoya-u.ac.jp> References: <46DE0C86 DOT 61C0ABB0 AT dessent DOT net> <20070906082343 DOT 87689790 DOT matsuoka AT mol DOT nagoya-u DOT ac DOT jp> Message-Id: <20070906083129.9ABD5FB0.matsuoka@mol.nagoya-u.ac.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: nPOP Ver 1.0.9 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Just a correction of the previous mail >I think it is better that I keep the my binary on my web but post on >the new binary package on the cygwin. I do not want to build the >octave by the gcc in the cygwin package because it is too slow to use. I think it is better that I keep the my binary on my web but 'not' post on the new binary package on the cygwin. I do not want to build the octave by the gcc in the cygwin package because it is too slow to use. Sorry for my carelessness. Tatsuro MATSUOKA -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/