X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <20070903165936.2808@blackhawk> From: "d.henman" Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2007 16:59:36 +0900 To: Subject: Re: tty dissociation In-reply-to: Your message of Sun, 2 Sep 2007 21:28:25 -0400 <20070903012825.GA3098@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> References: <20070903074852 DOT 3148 AT blackhawk> <20070903012825 DOT GA3098 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> X-Mailer: MH-E 8.0.3; GNU Mailutils 1.2.1; GNU Emacs 22.1.50 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com I don't intend on improving it. The referred to post is rather old and I wanted to verify if it is still valid or if any newer methods came to be since the last URL reference I gave you. I assume from what you wrote that setsid() with no argumentss is still valid, correct? Regards, darel henman Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 07:48:52AM +0900, d.henman wrote: > >Corinna in the following message, specified a way, ie. use setsid(), > >to dissociate a tty from a process. > > > >http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2001-08/msg00753.html > > > >I ust want to ask if this is still the preferred method, or if any > >newer method exists? > > Are you aware of a newer method available in linux? How are you going > to improve on a single simple call to a function with no arguments? > > cgf > > -- > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/