X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 21:28:25 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: tty dissociation Message-ID: <20070903012825.GA3098@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20070903074852 DOT 3148 AT blackhawk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070903074852.3148@blackhawk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 07:48:52AM +0900, d.henman wrote: >Corinna in the following message, specified a way, ie. use setsid(), >to dissociate a tty from a process. > >http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2001-08/msg00753.html > >I ust want to ask if this is still the preferred method, or if any >newer method exists? Are you aware of a newer method available in linux? How are you going to improve on a single simple call to a function with no arguments? cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/