X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <057301c7e348$fe582b10$0600a8c0@ze4427wm>
From: "Aaron Gray" <angray AT beeb DOT net>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <03ca01c7e296$3698e4f0$0600a8c0 AT ze4427wm> <06e801c7e29c$38a6a790$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <040701c7e2a7$d4c7ace0$0600a8c0 AT ze4427wm> <051501c7e339$4aeb3cc0$0600a8c0 AT ze4427wm> <07be01c7e33d$abfb45b0$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <20070820153036 DOT GD23854 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
Subject: Re: REAL Problem building GCC on Cygwin on Vista
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 17:41:44 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; 	format=flowed; 	charset="iso-8859-1"; 	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

> On Aug 20 16:20, Dave Korn wrote:
>> On 20 August 2007 15:49, Aaron Gray wrote:
>> >>> On 19 August 2007 20:22, Aaron Gray wrote:
>> > AFACT this actually looks like a Vista problem.
>> > [...]
>>   Hm, that sounds like a file that you have write but not delete
>> permissions
>> to.
>>
>> > Can someone look into this please,
>>
>>   Well, just to state the obvious, /you/ would be the most ideally-placed
>> person to do so.
>>
>>   I don't even have Vista, so I'm kinda ruled out there, but I'd take a
>> look
>> at the perms and ACLs of conftest.dir and the existing depcomp file in
>> there,
>> using both 'getfacl' to show cygwin's view of the posix-style perms, and
>> 'cacls' to compare with windoze's opinion.
>>
>>   BTW, you didn't by any chance use winzip to unpack the tarball did you?

No.

> Apart from that, the file permission settings are the same in Vista
> compared to older OSes.  The exception is the UAC stuff which could
> result in some executables having less permissions than usual, if, for
> instance, Internet Explorer has been used to download the executable.
> We can hopefully rule this out here, so it's just some permission
> problem which has nothing to do with the base OS.

Works fine on XP. The only things that are diferent are the Cygwin
instillation and Vista.

>  Note: Not all
> problems on Vista are Vista's (or, FWIW, Cygwin's) fault.  See, for
> example http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PEBCAK for one possible explanation
> of the problem.

Nice reply :)

Does look like a case of PEBCAK.

Unmodified GCC 4.2.0 compiles okay, but when modified cracks appear, only on 
Vista though, XP is okay. So must be something to do with permissions.

Aaron


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/