X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 17:30:36 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: REAL Problem building GCC on Cygwin on Vista
Message-ID: <20070820153036.GD23854@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <03ca01c7e296$3698e4f0$0600a8c0 AT ze4427wm> <06e801c7e29c$38a6a790$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <040701c7e2a7$d4c7ace0$0600a8c0 AT ze4427wm> <051501c7e339$4aeb3cc0$0600a8c0 AT ze4427wm> <07be01c7e33d$abfb45b0$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <07be01c7e33d$abfb45b0$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Aug 20 16:20, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 20 August 2007 15:49, Aaron Gray wrote:
> >>> On 19 August 2007 20:22, Aaron Gray wrote:
> > AFACT this actually looks like a Vista problem.
> > [...]
>   Hm, that sounds like a file that you have write but not delete permissions
> to.
>  
> > Can someone look into this please,
> 
>   Well, just to state the obvious, /you/ would be the most ideally-placed
> person to do so.
> 
>   I don't even have Vista, so I'm kinda ruled out there, but I'd take a look
> at the perms and ACLs of conftest.dir and the existing depcomp file in there,
> using both 'getfacl' to show cygwin's view of the posix-style perms, and
> 'cacls' to compare with windoze's opinion.
> 
>   BTW, you didn't by any chance use winzip to unpack the tarball did you?

Apart from that, the file permission settings are the same in Vista
compared to older OSes.  The exception is the UAC stuff which could
result in some executables having less permissions than usual, if, for
instance, Internet Explorer has been used to download the executable.
We can hopefully rule this out here, so it's just some permission
problem which has nothing to do with the base OS.  Note: Not all
problems on Vista are Vista's (or, FWIW, Cygwin's) fault.  See, for
example http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PEBCAK for one possible explanation
of the problem.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/