X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:18:13 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: How to rename file case-sensitive? Message-ID: <20070815151813.GB1592@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <46C13A16 DOT 6090801 AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net> <20070815075735 DOT GH8535 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <021e01c7df4c$7255e990$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 08:10:37AM -0700, Andrew DeFaria wrote: > Dave Korn wrote: >> On 15 August 2007 15:50, Andrew DeFaria wrote: >> >>> Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>>> On Aug 15 00:48, Andrew DeFaria wrote: >>>>> Jeff Hawk wrote: >>>>>> [disclaimer] >>>>> [FULL QUOTED!] >>>> Was that really necessary just to make a fun out of it? >>> Is quoting ever really necessary? >>>>> Dang 2! Not *that's* a long sig. I always chuckle at the silly attempt >>>>> to make this legal statement. >>>> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2007-08/msg00108.html >>> Huh? And I'm supposed to do what with this URL? >> >>It's called a 'reference'. You can try things such as 'looking it up' >>and 'seeing what it says'. It was probably given to you for a reason >>called 'FYI', and 'because it's directly relevant to what we were just >>talking about'. >> >>Earlier you showed us that you don't know how to quote. Now you're >>showing us that you don't know how to click. > >Again, huh? Called a reference - no it was not called a reference. >The word was not even mentioned. All that was present was a URL. And >yes smart ass I know how to click, and read for that matter. Do you? >Did you click and read it? I suspect not. Yes it mentioned about >disclaimers *for some other group* and about some thing to institute a >block, etc. But it wasn't about this group nor about the points I >brought up leading me to say "huh" as in *how exactly do you fell that >this URL and the page it references is relevant to what I was talking >about???* Listen if you or Corina wishes to be terse and not explain >things then expect questions. http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2007-08/msg00161.html I really hoped that this discussion would go away but since you're insistent, let me point out that opinions about disclaimers are irrelevant as far as the cygwin list is concerned. Everyone agrees that disclaimers are annoying and, FYI, *quoting* the whole disclaimer in your message just compounds the annoyance. Please use the cygwin-talk list if you want to expound on this any further. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/