X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 16:00:13 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: gdate command Message-ID: <20070807200013.GA25907@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20070807183941 DOT GA17092 AT panix DOT com> <46B8C4CB DOT 3050105 AT byu DOT net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 07:53:49PM +0000, Eric Blake wrote: >Eric Blake byu.net> writes: > >> According to David Arnstein on 8/7/2007 12:39 PM: >> > Since someone has already provided glib2-devel, is there an easy way to >> > compile a valid gdate.exe for cygwin? >> >> I have no reason to complicate my packaging of coreutils just to >> add a 'g' prefix. > >Following up to myself, if you still want gdate, then you could simply: > >ln -s /bin/date /usr/local/bin/gdate > >The same goes for other GNU utilities that are often shipped with 'g' >prefixes on systems with non-GNU counterparts, such as gmake, gtar, ... I think it's actually a different program, at least that's the hint google gave me. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/