X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <46B2141B.3C4ADDC0@dessent.net> Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 10:27:55 -0700 From: Brian Dessent X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: links References: <20070731213343 DOT 3444 AT blackhawk> <20070731125915 DOT GA21952 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20070802172219 DOT 1708 AT blackhawk> <20070802084016 DOT GR13674 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Corinna Vinschen wrote: > The SYSTEM type was the only one until 2001, default until 2002, > and still produced by setup.exe. On that topic... I always felt it was a bit inconsistent that setup still uses the old-style symlink, but obviously it works fine as otherwise there would be lots of breakage. I am tempted to rewrite that code to use the .lnk style symlinks, but I don't want to introduce a possible destabilization just for aesthetics. Can you think of any real justification for getting rid of these old-style symlinks? Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/