X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Matthew Woehlke <mw_triad AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
Subject:  Re: Request for running a test application
Date:  Wed, 01 Aug 2007 10:50:20 -0500
Lines: 53
Message-ID: <f8qa3t$e05$1@sea.gmane.org>
References:  <20070801090736 DOT GA11738 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
Mime-Version:  1.0
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding:  7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.12) Gecko/20070509 Thunderbird/1.5.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0
In-Reply-To: <20070801090736.GA11738@calimero.vinschen.de>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> I have a request for help.  I need as much different information I can
> get.  To get this information, I'm asking all of you to run the attached
> test application and return the printed output as reply to this mail.
> [snip]
> 
> I'm looking for
>   - Remote NFS over SFU NFS

Remote NFS (ufs) over SFU:

Device Type        : 7
Characteristics    : 10
Volume Name        : <>
Serial Number      : (varies)
Max Filenamelength : 255
Filesystemname     : <NFS>
Flags              : 2
   FILE_CASE_SENSITIVE_SEARCH  : FALSE
   FILE_CASE_PRESERVED_NAMES   : TRUE
   FILE_UNICODE_ON_DISK        : FALSE
   FILE_PERSISTENT_ACLS        : FALSE
   FILE_FILE_COMPRESSION       : FALSE
   FILE_VOLUME_QUOTAS          : FALSE
   FILE_SUPPORTS_SPARSE_FILES  : FALSE
   FILE_SUPPORTS_REPARSE_POINTS: FALSE
   FILE_SUPPORTS_REMOTE_STORAGE: FALSE
   FILE_VOLUME_IS_COMPRESSED   : FALSE
   FILE_SUPPORTS_OBJECT_IDS    : FALSE
   FILE_SUPPORTS_ENCRYPTION    : FALSE
   FILE_NAMED_STREAMS          : FALSE
   FILE_READ_ONLY_VOLUME       : FALSE
   FILE_SEQUENTIAL_WRITE_ONCE  : FALSE
   FILE_SUPPORTS_TRANSACTIONS  : FALSE

I have other NFS mounts, all ufs from the same machine; the serial 
number increases sequentially for distinct exports (i.e. one of my 
mounts is a subdir of the export, which is itself also mounted as a 
different letter; those two have the same SN).

I got the same results for one other NFS volume I have mounted that is a 
different server (possibly a different underlying fs also), except a 
wildly different serial number of course.

Also, this is expected I'm sure, but in case you don't have the drives 
to test I can confirm that IDE vs. SATA doesn't make a difference (at 
least with the one-of-each NTFS HD's I tested).

I had to use the 'alternate version' on the other computer I tested with.

-- 
Matthew
"Let's call it an accidental feature." -- Larry Wall


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/